Educational Conceptual Model Design Research Methodology
Issue
Section
Keywords:
Conceptual model, educational conceptual model design, educational technology, research methodology
Published
Abstract
This paper introduces Educational Conceptual Model Design a new research methodology to develop conceptual models in the field of educational technology. It is based on principles from Conceptual Design Methodology, Conceptual Modeling Methodology, Design-Based Research, and Design Science Research. It is a systematic methodology structured in four phases: problem definition, conceptual foundation, model development, and knowledge contribution. This methodology is designed to be streamlined and grounded in theory, focusing on consistency, replicability, and alignment with theoretical rigor. The methodology is particularly suited to respond to rapid advancements in technology and continuously evolving educational challenges, including the integration of emerging tools such as Artificial Intelligence in Education. Its main characteristic is that it offers a transition from problem identification to practical models with a special emphasis on the design process. This approach reduces the complexity of developing a model while maintaining its applicability across different educational technology areas, which can range from adaptive learning systems to data-driven learning analytics. The paper concludes by discussing the methodology’s contributions to theory and practice, its limitations, and potential future directions, including scalability, cross-disciplinary integration, and the incorporation of disruptive technologies. This methodology serves as a foundational framework for researchers and practitioners aiming to design innovative forward-thinking solutions that meet the dynamic needs of modern education.
Supporting agencias
NoLicense
Copyright (c) 2025 Los/Las autores/autoras
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant in the journal the right of first publication of the work, registered under a Creative Commons acknowledgement licence (CC BY-NC-SA), which allows dissemination with acknowledgement of authorship and first publication in this journal.
- Authors may independently enter into other contractual arrangements to allow publication of the version published in this journal in other media (e.g., in an institutional repository or in a book), with acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
- Authors have permission to publish their work online and are encouraged to do so (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, because it can produce good results and lead to the published work receiving more citations (see The Effect of Open Access).
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Names and email addresses on the journal website will only be used for the uses indicated in this journal and will not be made available for any other use or to third parties.
Downloads
References
Adeoye, M. A. (2024). Mastering the Basics: A Guide to Research Methodology for Effective Writing and Publication. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1345
Bernasconi, A., & García S, A. (2024). Conceptual Modeling for Bioinformatics. Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2nd Edition, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95502-7.00003-8
Bourdeau, J. (2017). The DBR Methodology for the Study of Context in Learning. In: Brézillon, P., Turner, R., Penco, C. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10257. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_44
Bozlu, B., & Demirörs, O. (2008). A conceptual modeling methodology: From conceptual model to design. Proceedings of the 2008 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5555/2367656.2367686
Buchmann, R., Ghiran, A. M., Döller, V., & Karagiannis, D. (2019). Conceptual modeling education as a “design problem.” Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, 21, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.7250/CSIMQ.2019-21.02
Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2018). Developing, testing, and using theoretical models for promoting quality in education. Educational Effectiveness Theory, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.869233
Clark, T., & Evans, A. (1997). Foundations of the Unified Modeling Language. Electronic Workshops In Computing. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/fa1997.6
De Sordi, J. O. (2021). Design science research methodology: theory development from artifacts. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82156-2_5
Delport, P. M., Von Solms, R., & Gerber, M. (2024). Methodological Guidelines for Design Science Research. Procedia Computer Science, 237, 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.096
Dimian, A.C., Costin, S., Bildea, C.S., & Kiss, A.A. (2019). 2-Process Systems Approach in Conceptual Process Design. Simulation of Sustainable Chemical Processes, 43-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63876-2.00002-4
Elger, Y. (2024). Überarbeitungsphasen als Kristallisationspunkt eines Design-Research-Projekts: Ein Praxisbeispiel. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.8.2.2205
Fahd, K., Miah, S. J., Ahmed, K., Venkatraman, S., & Miao, Y. (2021). Integrating design science research and design based research frameworks for developing education support systems. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4027–4048. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10442-1
Faustmann, G., Kirchner, K., Lemke, C., & Monett, D. (2019). Which factors make digital learning platforms successful? INTED Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1651
Fletcher, K. A., Hicks, V. L., Johnson, R. H., Laverentz, D. M., Phillips, C. J., Pierce, L. N., Wilhoite, D. L., & Gay, J. E. (2019). A Concept Analysis of Conceptual Learning: A Guide for Educators. Journal Of Nursing Education, 58(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190103-03
Foelsing, J., Schmitz, A., Foelsing, J., & Schmitz, A. (2021). New Work braucht New Learning: Eine Perspektivreise durch die Transformation unserer Organisations-und Lernwelten. EdTech. Update–New Tools Fürs New Learning, 267–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32758-3_10
Fonseca, C. M., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J. P. A., Sales, T. P., & Porello, D. (2022). Incorporating types of types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_2
Garcia-Lopez, C., Mor, E., & Tesconi, S. (2020). Human-Centered Design as an Approach to Create Open Educational Resources. Sustainability, 12(18), 7397. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187397
Gee, L. L. S. (2022). Integrating Design Features for E-Learning Platforms. International Academic Symposium Of Social Science 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022082023
Grames, E. M., Schwartz, D., & Elphick, C. S. (2022). A systematic method for hypothesis synthesis and conceptual model development. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(9), 2078-2087. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13940
Gray, K., & Sockolow, P. (2016). Conceptual models in health informatics research: a literature review and suggestions for development. JMIR medical informatics, 4(1), e5021. 10.2196/medinform.5021
Haj-Bolouri, A., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Bernhardsson, L. (2017) Action Design Research as a Method-in-Use: Problems and Opportunities. Conference: DESTRIT https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320621772_Action_Design_Research_as_a_Method-in-Use_Problems_and_Opportunities
Halpin, T., & Morgan, T. (2008). 3-Conceptual Modeling: First Steps. In Information Modeling and Relational Databases (pp. 59–108). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373568-3.50007-2
Henriksson, H., & Grunewald, E. W. (2020). Society as a Stakeholder. In: Sustainability Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42291-2_10
Hertzum, M. (2003). Making use of scenarios: a field study of conceptual design. International Journal Of Human-Computer Studies, 58(2), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(02)00138-6
Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
Holmberg, J. (2017). Applying a conceptual design framework to study teachers’ use of educational technology. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2333-2349. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-016-9536-3
Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2023). Design science for small scale studies: Recommendations for undergraduates and junior researchers. European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (ECRM 2023), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecrm.22.1.1702
Huseynli, M., Bub, U., & Ogbuachi, M. C. (2022). Development of a Method for the Engineering of Digital Innovation Using Design Science Research. Information, 13(12), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13120573
Johnson, J., & Henderson, A. (2024). What Conceptual Models Are and Are Not. In Conceptual Models: Core to the Design of Interactive Applications (pp. 21–35). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50852-3_3
Kulesa, J., Induru, S., Hubbard, E., & Bhansali, P. (2024). The Conceptual Framework: A Practical Guide. Hospital Pediatrics, 14(11), e503–e508. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007794
León-Garrido, A., Barroso, J., & Barroso, J. (2024). Diseño y validación de un instrumento de evaluación para apps móviles musicales a través del juicio de expertos. Aula Abierta, 53(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.20620
Ling-ling, L., Yong-Guang, D., & Zhi-gang, L. (2009). The Conceptual Design Method of Mechanical Products. 2009 Second International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, 1, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSE.2009.712
Liu, J., Wang, S., & Fu, C. (2017). Design Analysis Method for Multidisciplinary Complex Product using SysML. MATEC Web of Conferences, 139, 00014. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713900014
López-Villanueva, D., Santiago, R., & Palau, R. (2024). ¿Es el momento de la personalización del aprendizaje? Retos y oportunidades del uso de la inteligencia artificial. En Dykinson eBooks. https://doi.org/10.14679/3547
López-Villanueva. D., Palau, R., & Santiago, R. (2024) Analizando alternativas metodológicas para la investigación educativa: Design Science Research (DSR). UTE Teaching & Technology (Universitas Tarraconensis). Pre-print
Ma, G. L., Li, Y., Li, W. Q., & Pan, P. Y. (2011). A process model and method of idea generation for conceptual design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(4), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041297510394103
Manov, B., Lendzhova, V., & Milenkova, V. (2022). Digital Aspects of Modern Society and Education Realities. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2022/v13i330357
Mills, K. A., Cope, J., Scholes, L., & Rowe, L. (2024). Coding and Computational Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Review of Educational Outcomes. Review Of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241241327
Minai, A. A., Iyer, L. R., Padur, D., & Doboli, S. (2009). A dynamical connectionist model of idea generation. 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5178932
Müller, R., & Thoring, K. (2011). Understanding artifact knowledge in design science: Prototypes and products as knowledge repositories. 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2011, 1–10. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/216
Muzuva, M. (2024). Innovative Teaching and Learning: Exploring The Perceptions Of Higher Education Sector on 4th Industrial Revolution. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v1i2.885
Nazlidou, I., Efkolidis, N., Kakoulis, K., & Kyratsis, P. (2024). Innovative and Interactive Technologies in Creative Product Design Education: A Review. Multimodal Technologies And Interaction, 8(12), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8120107
Obczovsky, M., Bernsteiner, A., Haagen‐Schützenhöfer, C., & Schubatzky, T. (2024). Systematizing Decisions in Design‐Based Research: From Theory to Design. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21915
Parker, M., Cruz, L., Gachago, D., & Morkel, J. (2020). Design Thinking for Challenges and Change in K–12 and Teacher Education. Journal Of Cases In Educational Leadership, 24(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458920975467
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Pliushch, V., & Sorokun, S. (2022). Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in Education System. Revista Tempos e Espaços Em Educação, 15(34). https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v15i34.16960
Premananda, I. G. A., Tjahyanto, A., & Mukhlason, A. (2022). Design Science Research Methodology and Its Application to Developing a New Timetabling Algorithm. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberneticsCom55287.2022.9865661
Rettberg, J. W., Crawford, K., Schultz, J., Taylor, L., Suchman, L., Andrejevic, M., & Ananny, M. (2024). An AI Society: Artificial intelligence is reshaping society, but human forces shape AI. Issues in Science & Technology, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.58875/tjod6844
Robinson, S., Arbez, G., Birta, L., Tolk, A., & Wagner, G. (2015). Conceptual Modeling: Definition, Purpose, and Benefits. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2015.7408386
Rodríguez Medina, M. A., Poblano-Ojinaga, E. R., Alvarado Tarango, L., González Torres, A., & Rodríguez Borbón, M. I. (2021). Validación por juicio de expertos de un instrumento de evaluación para evidencias de aprendizaje conceptual. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.960
Rose, J. (1997) Soft Systems Methodology as a Social Science Research Tool. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(4) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235721865_Soft_Systems_Methodology_as_a_Social_Science_Research_Tool
Shagirbasha, S. (2024). Journey of an Edupreneur—Design- Thinking Approach. Vikalpa The Journal For Decision Makers, 49(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909241254147
Samanth, M. (2024). A Brief Introduction to Research Methodology. International Journal Od Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 12(5). https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2405813.pdf
Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-Based Research: A Methodology to Extend and Enrich Biology Education Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), es11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245
Sein, N., Henfridsson, N., Purao, N., Rossi, N., & Lindgren, N. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
Taura, T. (2016). Methodology of Conceptual Design. Creative Design Engineering, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804226-7.00009-0
Tinoca, L., Piedade, J., Santos, S., Pedro, A., & Gomes, S. (2022). Design-Based Research in the Educational Field: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 12(6), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060410
Vaezi, H., Moonaghi, H. K., & Golbaf, R. (2019). Design-Based Research: Definition, Characteristics, Application and Chal-lenges. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 5(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v5i1.185
Valencia-Contrera, M., Rivera-Rojas, F., Villa-Velásquez, J., Ardiles-Irarrazabal, R., Febré, N., & Valenzuela-Suazo, S. (2023). Methodological strategies for the generation of conceptual models in nursing. Salud Cienc Tecnol, 315. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2023315
Vaishnavi, V. & Kuechler, W. (2015). Design Science Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. http://desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/
Venable, J.R., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R.L. (2017). Choosing a Design Science Research Methodology. ACIS. 017 Proceedings. 112. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2017/112
Weigand, H., & Johannesson, P. (2023). How to identify your design science research artifact. 2023 IEEE 25th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/cbi58679.2023.10187511
